DMA (was sendmail bug et al..)
matthias at dragonflybsd.org
Wed Feb 20 06:22:31 PST 2008
* Bill Hacker wrote:
> First glance at the man page, 'dma' looks clean and KISS-driven..
> NOT listening on port 25 takes care of a whole raft of potential exploits. What
> remans is to check errant script/daemon resistance.
If you find any bugs, inconsistencies etc mail to bugs at .
> Do you know if anyone has tried 'dma' on other-than DFLY platform yet?
It is clean C code and should compile out-of-the-box on *BSD. At least
dma compiles and works with DragonFly and FreeBSD. But I'm sure it
could work under almost all Unixes ...
More information about the Kernel