HAMMER2 stability

Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez paaguti at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 03:04:16 PDT 2017


I chose HAMMER and not HAMMER2 in the installation process :-(

/PA

El 23 oct. 2017 10:58, "karu.pruun" <karu.pruun at gmail.com> escribió:

> Hello
>
> Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
> caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
>
> Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you
> missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things in the
> future.
>
> Cheers
>
> Peeter
>
> --
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> <paaguti at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > After I got DFly running on my old Optimus laptop, I got an exception
> from
> > the hammer module and wasn't able to recover it. I gave  FreeBSD 11.1 a
> try
> > and have almost everything I need running much more out of the box than
> with
> > DFly. You are getting better and I will put my notes on getting it
> running
> > on Optimus in the WIKI, but it's not yet where I need it to be.
> >
> > Sorry, /PA
> >
> > El 23 oct. 2017 1:59, "Antonio Olivares" <olivares14031 at gmail.com>
> escribió:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data?
> >>
> >>
> >> That is what the 5.0 release page states:
> >>
> >>  https://www.dragonflybsd.org/release50/
> >>
> >>> Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes south?
> >>
> >>
> >> This is being worked on.  A new iso with the restoration tools is in the
> >> works, I have to find out where I read this to point it out.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171023/df3f0ef7/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list