HAMMER2 stability

[Michael Neumann]

On 10/23/17 10:58, karu.pruun wrote:
> Hello
> 
> Good to hear you got DragonFly running. I suppose it was HAMMER2 that
> caused problems, not HAMMER---the latter is stable.
> 
> Apart from HAMMER2, could you possibly tell more about what are you
> missing (list or privately)? This may help improve things in the
> future.

One thing I always wanted to have again is a revival of the GUI iso
image. It would be ideal to test newly bought hardware like laptops 
without the need to install it permanently on disk (I feel uneasy to 
return that piece of hardware in case I have installed sth. on disk).

Regards,

   Michael
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Peeter
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> <paaguti at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> After I got DFly running on my old Optimus laptop, I got an exception from
>> the hammer module and wasn't able to recover it. I gave  FreeBSD 11.1 a try
>> and have almost everything I need running much more out of the box than with
>> DFly. You are getting better and I will put my notes on getting it running
>> on Optimus in the WIKI, but it's not yet where I need it to be.
>>
>> Sorry, /PA
>>
>> El 23 oct. 2017 1:59, "Antonio Olivares" <olivares14031 at gmail.com> escribió:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is HAMMER2 considered experimental and not for production data?
>>>
>>>
>>> That is what the 5.0 release page states:
>>>
>>>   https://www.dragonflybsd.org/release50/
>>>
>>>> Do we have debug_fs file restoration tools, in case things goes south?
>>>
>>>
>>> This is being worked on.  A new iso with the restoration tools is in the
>>> works, I have to find out where I read this to point it out.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
NTECS Consulting
www.ntecs.de
Michael Neumann
+49 (0) 178 167 0649
mneumann at ntecs.de