3.8 release plans
zachary.crownover at gmail.com
Thu May 29 00:35:59 PDT 2014
Not that I'm defending an error, but why use UFS when you can use HAMMER?
I'm just curious.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:24 AM, karu.pruun <karu.pruun at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Zenny wrote:
> > Confirmation that iso works fine in VirtualBox 4.3.8 OSE with ACPI
> > disabled. But the img file didn't.
> > On 5/28/14, Justin Sherrill <justin at shiningsilence.com> wrote:
> >> "Hey this boots strangely oh wait it is just this particular version of
> >> VirtualBox that has the problem" has been a reported problem at what
> >> like every release for years. I'm starting to think that if anyone
> >> issues in VirtualBox, the first step should always be "try a different
> >> version of VirtualBox, or a different virtual system".
> Point taken, suppose it's a good idea to test on different machines.
> However, now it looks again like a DFly problem. I tested on
> Virtualbox 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and finally reproduced it on a physical
> machine too. It only concerns installations where all partitions are
> UFS. It does not show for a hammer system (ie root HAMMER and /boot
> I used the partition layout:
> / UFS
> /usr UFS
> when booting the system from hdd, the acpi/ehci error shows for DFly
> 3.6.x and 3.8.0RC where both are x86_64. So it appeared already in
mobile (310) 487-5573
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users