We need an active plan of action to fix libusb version 1.0
dragonflybsd at marino.st
Wed Jan 8 12:18:03 PST 2014
On 1/5/2014 18:07, John Marino wrote:
> As yet another example of how our in-between libusb is deeply hurting
> us, I'm able to completely build the chromium browser after some heavy
> Unfortunately, it doesn't link. It needs the new libusb, and it's
> deeply ingrained. I was unsuccessful at removing all functionality that
> needs libusb, thus we still don't have a chromium package.
> This is increasingly becoming a problem for us.
> We really need to have a working libusb (usb4bsd) established on this
> dev branch (3.7).
> To progress, we need a complete inventory of what is wrong with libusb
> that is preventing it from being turned on as a standard. Personally, I
> don't even know what's wrong with it other than it causes panics.
> Then the second step is that we need somebody to volunteer to implement
> the identified fixes (and actually do it).
> Any volunteers to spearhead finishing off libusb development?
I just noticed on gitweb that Markus Pfeiffer (profmakx) has made over a
dozen commits in the last 24 hours, many of which seem related to USB.
Will these commits fix USB 1 support in DF and has default changed (or
More information about the Users