Updating Question

[Antonio Huete Jimenez]

Hi,

We're trying to reproduce your scenario to get the best approach for your
upgrade process. We'll keep you posted.

Cheers.
 El 01/11/2012 02:18, "Justin Sherrill" <justin at shiningsilence.com>
escribió:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Konrad Neuwirth
> <konrad at mailathome.or.at> wrote:
> > Dear reader,
> >
> > there is one production system that we have that is still running an
> acient version:
> >
> > | DragonFly  2.0.1-RELEASE DragonFly 2.0.1-RELEASE
> >
> > As you can imagine, I'd like to update that – we're hitting one bug in
> the filesystem code there ever so often.
> >
> > Is there anything that would keep us from just doing the update? and
> what would be the smartest way to do so?
>
> If you follow /usr/src/UPDATING, that should cover any irregularities
> in updating from version to version.  It may be worth updating to 2.2,
> then 2.8, then I think 3.2, just because those seem to be the major
> releases where there were changes in the upgrade path.  I haven't
> tried it like that, so this is an educated guess.
>
> Don't forget to upgrade your Hammer filesystems too.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121101/beaa16f3/attachment-0003.htm>