zipped ISO in addition to gz?
Justin C. Sherrill
justin at shiningsilence.com
Thu Aug 7 11:29:56 PDT 2008
On Thu, August 7, 2008 12:25 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Would there be any objection to having zipped versions of our ISOs? The
> :file size wouldn't change much.
> I see the reasoning but I don't like the idea of the multiplication of
> space used for N different compressed versions of the ISOs.
> It may be easier just to provide a pointer on the download page
> to windoz programs capable of decompressing the .gz.
Zip will decompress automatically on Windows. There's no other N number
of formats to add.
Here's another way to put this: If someone downloads a FreeBSD, NetBSD,
Fedora, Ubuntu, or Debian ISO image, they don't need to download a
separate program from a different website just to unlock it. In that
light, is the 120M saved so important?
More information about the Users