joerg at britannica.bec.de
Mon Jan 24 10:37:59 PST 2005
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:31:34AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> rfork(). The same mechanism that the 1:1 library would use, but
> it would only rfork for the number of cpus rather then rfork for
> each thread.
The 1:1 library does a rfork for each thread, our own library would use
min(no of threads, no of cpus), right?
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More information about the Users