Less radical layout

Jeremy Messenger mezz7 at cox.net
Sat Feb 21 08:12:05 PST 2004

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:05:05 +0000, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:

> Jeremy Messenger <mezz7 at xxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:pan.2004. at xxxxxxx: 
>> I like DragonFly's menu font (speak of size/bold), it's perfect. This
>> one is kind of thin due to non-bold. Can you try to to get the font
>> colour change to something like black when the highlight is cover the
>> menu link? Because, the bright lime-green with bright blue/purple font
>> aren't friendly on the eyes. Well, maybe it's lime-green that who
>> aren't eyes friendly, perhaps get it a little darker (not too bright)?
>> In logo, the lime-green looks little darker.
> The subitems do look a bit anemic.  I'll work on this all tonight when
> the kids are asleep. 
>> Try to use the percent instead the harcore one; it's more smaller
>> width screen friendly. No nasty width scrollbar if you use the percent
>> in width. Try to resize your browser on DragonFly and your to smaller
>> width to get the idea.
> I'd argue that very few (<1%) browsers being used in a less than
> 800-pixel wide format these days, so I doubt it matters.  Interestingly,
> looking at other BSD sites, most of them expect at least that width. 
> Only FreeBSD and NetBSD break down correctly - commercial sites like SGI
> (Irix) and IBM (AIX) don't.  It's easy enough to correct for, however.

It matters when you destroy it. :-) Sometimes, I don't like to read
the very long left to right, so I make it smaller to make it easier
and faster to read. Anyway, thanks for willing to correct it.


bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.

More information about the Submit mailing list