Any last-minute 3.6 commits?
Justin Sherrill
justin at shiningsilence.com
Wed Nov 20 17:35:38 PST 2013
It's never too late. Are you saying that MFCing this change would add 6000
packages that would otherwise not build? If that is so, we can
cherry-pick, tag 3.6.1, and that is what we release. Extra packages are
more beneficial than a version number ending in 0.
On Nov 20, 2013 4:03 AM, "John Marino" <dragonflybsd at marino.st> wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 06:08, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> > It's been two weeks, and dports packages are built (thanks marino) and
> > release notes are mostly done (thanks ftigeot) and there's no nasty bugs
> > waiting that I know of, or MFCs pending... I'm not used to it being so
> > quiet.
> >
> > Tomorrow night I'll tag 3.6.0 and start building the iso/img files.
> > There's no GUI images right now because of the dports switch, but
> > that's not worth holding up the release.
>
> Hi Justin,
> I just found out this commit:
>
> http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/commit/a8e6840433fdc0aad2b0b8b58429ed1f29f848dd
>
> was not MFC'd. That was unfortunate. It actually caused 6000+ dports
> breakage on Release 3.6 after libcheck was adjusted for master. Too
> late now, I guess.
>
> John
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20131120/0d79e555/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list