Repository changes coming up
Sepherosa Ziehau
sepherosa at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 01:34:48 PST 2008
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Matthias Schmidt
<matthias at dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> BTW, pkgsrc scmgit's updating is not controlled by us, so why should
>> we risk our project's SCM?
>
> We don't "risk" our SCM. If we have a stable version, we can use it. If an
> update is available, we can either use it or drop it. Even if the pkgsrc
> version is broken, we can still use the version which worked for us in the
> past. IIRC we deal with cvsup like this ... (besides the fact that we don't
> update cvsup at all).
cvsup is not required to make the our old cvs function properly; I
think the situation is a little different between git and cvsup.
Do you imply we put a binary git in the base? I may be too conservative here...
Best Regards,
sephe
--
Live Free or Die
More information about the Kernel
mailing list