HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Thu Feb 7 12:04:11 PST 2008
:I might be wrong (and have misunderstood your reply) but I think he
:asked whether it would be possible to disallow a user to access the
:historical data (even if it is present on the disk). As I have not
:studied the code I might be wrong, but should it not be quite easy to
:create some switch which determines whether a @@0x<timestamp> will be
:treated as a normal filename or the name or not?
Yes, that would be a simple mount flag to tell HAMMER to only allow
the @@ extension for the superuser. The default could be to only allow
@@ for root or for files owned by the user in question.
<dillon at backplane.com>
More information about the Kernel