RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch

[ALeine]

dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 

>     I don't have any plans to backport GEOM.	We have plans to create a 
>     more generic device and vfs infrastructure, which is similar, but 
>     we have no plans to backport the actual GEOM code.

When do you expect the VFS code to be ready for the implementation of such
a GEOM-like layer? Also, do you intend to keep the API and the terminology
compliant with that of GEOM?

ALeine
___________________________________________________________________
WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net