cvs and new distributions

[Simon 'corecode' Schubert]

On 20.09.2004, at 14:09, David Rhodus wrote:
Actually there's no simple way in CVS to add unversioned tree into
a repository other than by using `cvs import'.
So the question is, are we going to use cvs import for this again?
Why not? I don't see any problem in using `cvs import' to actually
import an external codes to our tree. Or did I miss an earlier 
discussion
against using `cvs import' at all?
Did I receive any response to this message?
There is really no compelling reason to use one over the other(import, 
add).
well, import adds directories and files in one go; add needs all 
directories as explicit arguments

cheers
  simon
--
/"\
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00028.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20040920/85b88714/attachment-0020.obj>