Source tarballs?

Simon 'corecode' Schubert corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Fri Feb 20 18:31:41 PST 2004


On 20.02.2004, at 22:55, Peter Kadau wrote:
    Putting them on the CD is also not a good idea (just in case 
someone
    brings that up as an idea).  It bloats the CD, the sources become 
    obsolete almost instantly, and they present a release-management 
bloat
    issue as well making it difficult to manage the CD release builds.
Well, how about that ?
Put a full repository in tgz-form somewhere. This takes about 95 megs.
You have a base to get up-to-date easily and are not tempted to 
download
that all the time.
Maybe one could take an iso with a full repo and gzip that - it will
take about 160 megs approximately since the nrelease-iso takes about
60 megs in gziped form.
And to manage *that* is not difficult.
Managing is not the problem. But I really don't like downloading 
sources with the ISO. Additionally, I was under the impression that 
cvsup didn't really use the sources for the initial sync... but I could 
be wrong there.

cheers
  simon
--
/"\   http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00016.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20040220/9e94dc89/attachment-0020.obj>


More information about the Kernel mailing list