any interest in importing pf?
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Thu Nov 6 14:34:04 PST 2003
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:23:50 +0000, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> My thought of that... Anyone shouldn't replace or remove neither, but just
>> add PF to have one more choice of firewall. :-) Unless, IPF and PF can't
>> play together nice, then it explains.
>
> Donno about this, but we will surely need to update the
> PFIL_HOOKS code in-order to bring in OpenBSD's Packet Filter.
>
>> If add PF, then it means one of you will have to bring ALTQ in too? CARP
>> will be insterest to play with too, btw.
>
> We don't have to bring in ALTQ, but it would be good to have it
> IMHO. As far as CARP is concerned, I wonder if FreeVRRP by the
> KAME project is better than it or not, is still yet to be
> researched.
I agree about ALTQ!
Cheers,
Mezz
> Regards,
--
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
More information about the Kernel
mailing list