any interest in importing pf?

Hiten Pandya hmp at backplane.com
Thu Nov 6 14:23:50 PST 2003


Jeremy Messenger wrote:

My thought of that... Anyone shouldn't replace or remove neither, but just
add PF to have one more choice of firewall. :-) Unless, IPF and PF can't
play together nice, then it explains.
	Donno about this, but we will surely need to update the
	PFIL_HOOKS code in-order to bring in OpenBSD's Packet Filter.
If add PF, then it means one of you will have to bring ALTQ in too? CARP
will be insterest to play with too, btw.
	We don't have to bring in ALTQ, but it would be good to have it
	IMHO.  As far as CARP is concerned, I wonder if FreeVRRP by the
	KAME project is better than it or not, is still yet to be
	researched.
	Regards,

--
Hiten Pandya
hmp at xxxxxxxxxxxxx





More information about the Kernel mailing list