[issue543] kern.post.mk patch - NO_KERNEL_OLD_STRIP

Thomas Nikolajsen thomas.nikolajsen at mail.dk
Wed Jan 31 06:38:21 PST 2007

> Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode at fs.ei.tum.de> added the
> comment:
> Is there a particular reason why you use mv instead of cp
> (or ln)?

Good point; using cp(1) is fine.
Then chflags(1) shouldn't be applied to existing kernel.
Guess you want to keep existing semantics: keeping inode for kernel and modules.


More information about the Bugs mailing list