ksh in base?

[Simon 'corecode' Schubert]

On 14.02.2005, at 10:20, Eirik Nygaard wrote:
A further suggestion for bloating base :-)
I think we should hold off the discussion about new software to put in 
base
until we decide on which package system we are going to use. It would 
be better
to put some of these (and other software packages we have in base) out 
of base
and include them in the release builds as pure packages. This way you 
can decide
yourself if you want the package or not.
I don't think so. We can start the discussion again as soon as we have 
the possibility to package the base or to supply additional packages. 
Before that I'd just decide if putting $software in base is okay or 
not.

my vote is against another shell.

cheers
  simon
--
/"\
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00005.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/submit/attachments/20050214/81853bda/attachment-0013.obj>