A lot of pain, bugs and dissapointment in an attempt to get a functional desktop

[unix-enjoyer at tilde.institute]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:25:25PM +0000, unix-enjoyer at tilde.institute wrote:
> 
> Thank you Marino!
> 
> Looking back, I should've rewritten my email a third time, actually. And
> also triple-checked my points. This is a followup email to clear things
> up a little bit. In my defense, I can only say that I should've made a
> break instead of continuing to find solutions.
> 1. Docs mention the need for video drivers, I even remember how I wanted to delete the point that this is missing, but simply forgot to do so before sending the email. There is also no need to explain the need for installing graphics drivers as long as the user will install a full-featured xorg and not xorg-minimal.
> 2. I decided to compile ravenports from source because at the time my
> brain almost turned off from frustration and I missed the fact that I
> had to simply update the package with ravensw. But even after that,
> ravenadm still complained about being outdated. Thanks for adding this
> helpful section in the quickstart guide, I will test whether Xorg works
> tomorrow. As for why I said this nonsense about gnat: I meant that gnat
> is not available in dports, not ravenports, and again because my brain
> turned off, the ravensw option did not cross my mind. As for the
> question about clang, flang and gnat-llvm, it's coming from my sympathy
> to the OpenBSD copyright policy of "the software is not free, if it
> forces you to give code back". It's also related to the other question
> about outdated gcc and lack of llvm in base, basically.

So, I tried Xorg from ravenports, and now it refuses to start with the
following errors:
(EE) modesetting: module ABI major version (24) doesn't match the
server's version (25)
(EE)
Fatal server error:
(EE) no screens found(EE)

I guess (though I am not totally sure) that dragonflybsd's amdgpu is
behind the one ravenports Xorg was compiled for. The port
is based on 4.19, right?