hammer1 file system and underlying physical disks features

[Siju George]

Thank you so much :-)

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Tomohiro Kusumi <kusumi.tomohiro at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 1. Should all physical disks under a Master File System be of same
> size and speed/bandwidth?
>
> No.
>
> 2. Is there any Optimal Number? ( not max no. )
>
> Volumes are simply concatenated.
> Basically the next one is unused until the previous one is filled.
>
> 3. Can we mix IDE, SAS, SATA, SCSI for the same master file system?
>
> Yes.
> As long as fs sees them as block devices.
>
>
> 2017-09-20 14:42 GMT+03:00 Siju George <sgeorge.ml2 at gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This information is for an article I am writing for BSD Magazine.
> >
> > 1. Should all physical disks under a Master File System be of same size
> and
> > speed/bandwidth? Is there any benefit if it is so?
> >
> > 2. Is there any Optimal Number? ( not max no. )
> >
> > 3. Can we mix IDE, SAS, SATA, SCSI for the same master file system? Is
> there
> > any disadvantage in doing that?
> >
> > Thank you :-)
> >
> > Siju
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170921/12f1f57d/attachment-0002.html>