Network performance comparison as of today.

[Matthew Dillon]

We're all really excited, particularly now that dual-10Gbe is starting to
show up on low-cost server motherboards.  This kinda reminds me of when the
100 MBit to 1 Gbe transition began happening (years ago it seems).  I still
have a first-run commercial gigabit switch in my pile.  It's a huge box
with fans and 4 ports on it.  Count'm, *four* 1 Gbe ports in a box that
needs fans.  The transition ramp to 10Gbe seems to be running at around the
same pace, with a long high-price commercial ramp leading into a period of
huge cost and price reductions as the technology makes its way into the
consumer space.

Throw in a little NVMe-based SSD storage and a low-cost box today easily
has 100x the service capability verses just 10 years ago.

-Matt

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Samuel J. Greear <sjg at evilcode.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since so many folks are interested in the performance comparison, I
>> just did one network related comparison here:
>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf
>>
>> The intention is _not_ to troll, but to identify gaps, and what we can
>> do to keep improving DragonFlyBSD.
>>
>> According to the comparison, we _do_ find one area DragonFlyBSD's
>> network stack can be improved:
>> Utilize all available CPUs for network protocol processing.
>>
>> Currently we only use power-of-2 CPUs to handle network protocol
>> processing, e.g. on 24 CPUs system, only 16 CPUs will be used to
>> handle network protocol processing.  It is fine for workload involving
>> userland applications, e.g. the HTTP server workload.  But it seems
>> forwarding can enjoy all available CPUs.  I will work on this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> sephe
>>
>> --
>> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>>
>
>
> Sephe,
>
> Great work maximizing throughput while keeping the latency well bounded,
> this is a pretty astounding performance profile, many thumbs up.
>
>
> Sam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170303/4cc9f2bd/attachment-0003.htm>