File changes propagating in older snapshots: what am I doing wrong?

[Tomohiro Kusumi]

I'm just making a comment on dillon@'s reply, that a slave has no
inode at all until the initial syncing (and also documented nowhere).

2017-04-09 1:05 GMT+03:00  <tech_lists at mail.com>:
>> A slave PFS doesn't even have a PFS root inode till it's
>> once sync'd with a master.
>> Until then one can't really do anything with it
>> (can't even cd), but no document explains this.
>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2015-April/311953.html
>
> I'm not sure I'm understanding, but just to make sure I explained everything correctly: the PFSs with the 0x0000000000000000 ID listed among snapshot are not slaves, they are masters.
>