DFBSD load balancer and Gateway

[bycn82]

*Hi,*

*Thanks for testing the IPFW3. *

*Sorry that it still cannot filter the destination port, **I will add that
feature ASAP. ** I know it is a very basic feature, But IPFW3 is still
under development. recently I am working on the Lookup Tables. that can
improve the performance when we need to filter against lots of IP/MAC
addresses. I am also need this feature personally. If you want to try the
latest feature, You can download/compile the latest source from the github.
Or get the latest dfly release.*

*And any kind of feedback are welcome. :)*

*Regards,*
*bycn82*

On 12 April 2015 at 12:49, <satofujiyama at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:

> The Ipfw3 forward round-robin works. thanks.
> But how can I forward the HTTP traffic? Now I am fowardin the all TCP to 2
> ISP.
> I tried to use "TCP to any:80" but it not work. and some issue here.
>
>
> Thanks
> 佐藤
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* "satofujiyama at yahoo.co.jp" <satofujiyama at yahoo.co.jp>
> *To:* Predrag Punosevac <punosevac72 at gmail.com>; "users at dragonflybsd.org"
> <users at dragonflybsd.org>
> *Date:* 2015/4/9, Thu 09:42
> *Subject:* Re: DFBSD load balancer and Gateway
>
> No, I am not going to use pfSense, We need to setup everything by our-self.
> Maybe going to use OpenBSD again, I am familiar with it and it met our
> requirements.
>
> We are still testing FB and DFBSD,
> Between FB and DFBSD, I prefer FB. We tried to install php and apache on
> DFBSD, but failed to install.
>
>
> Thanks
> 佐藤
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Predrag Punosevac <punosevac72 at gmail.com>
> *To:* users at dragonflybsd.org
> *Date:* 2015/4/9, Thu 06:55
> *Subject:* Re: DFBSD load balancer and Gateway
>
> bycn82 wrote:
>
> > *Hi,*
> >
> > *Looks like that pfsense sales is approaching you :)*
>
> So OP would like to replace fully functional OpenBSD firewall and VPN
> server with DF IPFW3 for ??? reason. Fine it makes perfect sense if he
> is running DF only shop. However five e-mails later due to aparent lack
> of documentation for IPFW3 (or features) he is advised to move to
> PfSense turnkey appliance running and obsolete version of PF of FreeBSD
> 10.1. As a bonus he has to use insecure PHP based GUI for all
> configuration.
>
> Am I the only one to see that something is fundamentally wrong with the
> whole thread?
>
> Predrag
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150412/6b4fb7ff/attachment-0003.htm>