new user - quick test of dragonflybsd

[Wojciech Puchar]

examples are

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA3MDA

that shows very slow test of uncompressing large tarball. I observed the 
reverse - uncompressing large tarball to hammer filesystem is VERY fast 
relative to UFS.

other is here

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=dragonfly_hammer&num=2

i've seen some other test before that make me completely ignore 
DragonflyBSD hammer filesystem.


the final thought would be - do your own tests and don't believe anyone.



by the way i've read somewhere that Matt planned to include database like 
functionality in hammer filesystem directly - simply to allow btree 
structure to be used for any databases. (TO BE CLEAR - no SQL)

Would be great to have it and use it as database handler for harbour.

On Sat, 3 May 2014, Justin Sherrill wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>       Congratulations. Given all these articles about how bad DragonFly is in performance i see a completely different picture. I did few my own tests about non-I/O performance and
>       it seems to be at least not worse than FreeBSD.
> 
> 
> Wait, which articles?  There's one set of wildly inaccurate articles I can think of, but nothing else.
> 
> 
>