Opinions on SMF

[Outback Dingo]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:19 AM, joris dedieu <joris.dedieu at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2013/9/10 John Marino <dragonflybsd at marino.st>:
> > On 9/10/2013 00:31, Outback Dingo wrote:
> >>
> >> actually i mentiioned it weeks ago........... easier to integrate,
> >
> > Integrate into the BSD codebase?  Where is the analysis to prove that
> > assertion?
> >
> >> easier to manage,
> >
> > Easier than what?  Is there a survey or analysis to support that it is
> > easier than (everything else)?
> >
> > easier to port,
> >
> > This is same as integrate.  All I say is a statement from you that this
> > is the case.  Do you have anything else to support that it is easier to
> > port launchd than SMF or systemd to BSD?  (what the hell, throw in
> > "upgrading" rcng too)
> >
> > and launchd isnt Linux.... its from BSD
> >
> > Oh, mac.  I was getting confused with Ubuntu's upstart. (Sorry, my bad)
> > Still, calling launchd "BSD" is generous.  Has it been actually ported
> > to anything else?
>
> A port to FreeBSD was done during a summer of code
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd
> >
>

yeah, but its pretty incomplete.... so we had finished it, though it was
like i said for a commercial entity. be nice to see it redone and released


> >> and yes, a study was done 4 years ago by a commercial entity that
> >> actually did do the work for their benefit.
> >
> > So it won't be a problem to provide the reference or link to it?
> >
> > John
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130910/488a8e76/attachment-0002.html>