Opinions on SMF

[Petr Janda]

Using the same argument, we should replace everything, including Bourne
shell(often hard to read syntax), awk (it's short for awkward yeah?),
the user might have hard time understanding.

Just how often does anyone admin need to write/change the start scripts?

Petr

On 10/09/2013 7:57 AM, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> "It uses XML, which is bad because I don't understand it" is a very
> reasonable argument.  Especially if a significant portion of your
> customers/users say the same thing...
> 
> Note, I didn't say you could not change it from what is there now, but
> changing it to something that less people understand is definitely a
> valid issue imho.
> 
> -Toby.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Petr Janda <elekktretterr at exemail.com.au
> <mailto:elekktretterr at exemail.com.au>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     > I think Chris's statement a silly thing to say.  Have your heard the
>     > phrase, "If my aunt had a package, she'd be my uncle" ?
>     >
>     > rcng doesn't have these things.  Until it does, it's not in the same
>     > conversation.  Saying it would be equal if it had these things means
>     > nothing.
> 
>     I also think it's silly the best argument people can come up against SMF
>     is "It's made by Sun." or "It uses XML, which is bad because I don't
>     understand it".
> 
>     --
>     Please use PGP to encrypt your email to ensure our privacy is respected.
> 
> 


-- 
Please use PGP to encrypt your email to ensure our privacy is respected.





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130910/0d2ee8c4/attachment-0002.bin>