Proposal to modify behavior of installworld
John Marino
dragonflybsd at marino.st
Sun Feb 17 05:07:59 PST 2013
On 2/12/2013 18:46, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> So I would propose that the world-backup mechanic be a manual target
> and not an automatic process. e.g. like:
>
> make backupworld
> make restoreworld
>
> I do not think it would be a good idea to automatically backup the world
> when doing an installworld because of the issue of potentially doing
> multiple installworlds of unstable source and having your backup get
> blown away.
>
> However, the buildworld/installworld targets *COULD* warn you when
> there is no backup or the backup is very old (like over a month old)
> and suggest that you make a backup via the backupworld target before
> installing.
>
Hi Matt,
I have implemented this proposal in commit
7bee86c0ec635f688e37b15e7aa203a961ec4c84
There are 3 new make.conf parameters now:
WORLD_BACKUP - location to store backed up world binaries
default = /var/backups/world_binaries
DAYS_BACKUP - The number of days since the last backup that must
pass before "make installworld" fails with an error
default = 28
NO_BACKUP - defining this will prevent backup checks.
For those using UFS filesystems, there's a good chance the /var
partition isn't big enough because the default partition size is pretty
small. They will likely want to define WORLD_BACKUP.
This world backup behavior is on by default. Defining NO_BACKUP will
keep the original behavior.
John
More information about the Users
mailing list