Is anyone still using gcc 4.1 on master?

[John Marino]

On 11/8/2011 7:10 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
2011/11/8 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado<iam at juanfra.info>:
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc directly.
What C++ software or dependencies has DragonFly? I'm curious.
At least devd(8),

Joris
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
groff and gold linker are two more.
Tangential to the discussion of the lack of stated and current project 
goals, it's not a stated goal that DragonFly have a C-only base, nor 
that the virtue of simplicity is more valued over performance to the 
point of eliminating useful functionality.  As Samuel alluded, that's 
what he thinks is best.  I'm in the other camp and actually favor a 
system compiler capable of more languages.
John