SMP (Was: Why did you choose DragonFly?)
Justin C. Sherrill
justin at shiningsilence.com
Tue Sep 21 06:47:39 PDT 2010
On Mon, September 20, 2010 10:15 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> TMPFS becomes more viable with swapcache too. We have two bulk
> pkgsrc building boxes. More than two even, but two that I regularly
> use. One has a swapcache SSD (Pkgbox64) and one does not (Avalon).
> There is a gulf of difference in overall system performance between
> the two. The system requirements would be much higher, even needing
> more disk spindles for reasonable performance, without
That explains the noticable performance difference just logging in... I
always just thought avalon was getting used for something else I didn't
Is there benchmarks around for swapcache? i.e. same hardware, same
software task, with and without swapcache?
More information about the Users