2 questions regarding PF

[Przemysław Pawełczyk]

On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:16:54 +0100
Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer at web.de> wrote:

> I have to say one thing, too: Your demands towards this project in
> regard to documentation, actuality, features, etc, are pretty high,

Should I choose the list common denominator?

First of all I "said"/pointed at that DF lacks PF Guide known from
OpenBSD. Yes, my language was "demanding" the more so DF PF 4.2 is
different from PF 4.7+. The MAN page is not enough, some examples like
the OpenBSD's "Firewall for Home or Small Office" would be highly
advisable. From my point of view I do not understand why such important
part of any today's operating systems is not accompanied with *good*
packet filter guide(s).

> but your contributions are really not seeable. As long as this is the
> case, it would be very kind of you, if you just formulate your emails
> a little less demanding. I get the impression that you are trying to
> goad people involved in this project - on purpose or by weakness of
> character, I haven't found out yet. Of course I hope my impression is
> totally wrong and you are just honestly seeking help and just don't
> hit the right tone.

I hope your touchy nature is only a nano speck of your personality.
What would I gain being "goady" and alienating DF teamers? For what?

Writing about me in those words you crossed the line of personal
smearing.

"just don't hit the right tone" - a worshipper's tone would fit?

Kind regards
Przemysław Pawełczyk

-- 
Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick]
http://pp.blast.pl, pp_o2 at o2.pl
Attachment:
pgp00006.pgp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00006.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: "Description: PGP signature"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101103/78708c6f/attachment-0021.obj>