appropriate location for hammer snapshots
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Thu Feb 11 22:32:35 PST 2010
:Yes I checked it for both Master and Slave PFS the meta-data does get mirrored.
:Some of them has 'migrated' at the end of it what does it mean?
:
:0x000000017627d370 2010-02-02 03:18:00 IST migrated
:0x0000000176b5ef40 2010-02-03 03:18:00 IST migrated
:0x00000001782a85e0 2010-02-04 03:18:21 IST
:0x00000001782d0370 2010-02-05 03:18:17 IST
'migrated' is just in the comment field for the snapshot.
The comment field can be set when making manual snapshots
too.
:is it possible to access the snapshot If I know the TID?
:So as of now is it that I lost all the snapshots for my slave and I
:have to manually take snapshots of of the Slave PFS and store it some
:where outside the PFS untill something is implemented for
:regeneration?
:...
:Yes Matt thanks :-)
:
:--Siju
Yes, just use a similar path to the way the softlinks are
constructed, using the TID, e.g.:
cd <fs>/@@0x000000017627d370
The snapshots are still there (pruning is governed by
the snapshot list in the meta-data). If you want a
convenient set of softlinks you can construct them
by writing a little script based on the snapls output.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at backplane.com>
More information about the Users
mailing list