Does the Slave pfs take up more space that the Master?
Siju George
sgeorge.ml at gmail.com
Fri Apr 16 23:43:34 PDT 2010
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Matthew Dillon
<dillon at apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
>
> That's fine actually. The filesystems are not going to be
> block-for-block identical. The mirroring occurs at the record
> level and there is a lot of room for variation in the storage
> layout. This also means the filesystem partitions can be different
> sizes and the mirroring target can use different snapshot retention
> parameters.
>
>
Thanks Matt :-)
--Siju
More information about the Users
mailing list