Does the Slave pfs take up more space that the Master?
    Siju George 
    sgeorge.ml at gmail.com
       
    Fri Apr 16 23:43:34 PDT 2010
    
    
  
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Matthew Dillon
<dillon at apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
>
>    That's fine actually.   The filesystems are not going to be
>    block-for-block identical.  The mirroring occurs at the record
>    level and there is a lot of room for variation in the storage
>    layout.  This also means the filesystem partitions can be different
>    sizes and the mirroring target can use different snapshot retention
>    parameters.
>
>
Thanks Matt :-)
--Siju
    
    
More information about the Users
mailing list