Consequences of major libc changes

[Joerg Sonnenberger]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:28:23PM +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> The problem is that there is too many packages with common problem (for 
> DragonFly) - they don't include unistd.h, but compile regardless of that 
> on Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD, seems. Many of such packages are C++. Maybe 
> there is something wrong with our compiler? Examples of such packages are 
> ham/fldigi, x11/nucleo and editors/notecase.

I don't think it is the compiler. I also can't find any other *system*
header on NetBSD that pulls in unistd.h (except getopt.h, but that does
so on DragonFly as well).

Joerg