SMP performance on drgonfly
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Sun May 20 13:55:11 PDT 2007
:I was hoping that Matt would reply to my questions above so I could
:try to find a more level playing field on which to compare Dragonfly
:and FreeBSD, but I'm afraid that the answer is that there currently
:are *no* kernel subsystems that are not Giant-locked, so all workloads
:will perform poorly on DragonFly (and there are no specialized tools
:for studying SMP behaviour -- certainly I couldn't find any when I
:looked).
:
:Can someone confirm whether this is true?
:
:Kris
Well, you can set kern.syscall_mpsafe=1 and kern.trap_mpsafe=1
(don't set kern.intr_mpsafe to 1, though).
With those set, *SOME* system calls will not need the big giant lock.
e.g. things like getuid() and dup(). But anything doing I/O will
still get the lock. The BGL will be pushed in a little even for
system calls that still need it, but not by much. All significant
interrupts still need it, too.
We're looking for volunteers to help lock up subsystems. The main
one that is just about ready is the network stack.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at backplane.com>
More information about the Users
mailing list