comparing cvsup vs. rsync
Simon 'corecode' Schubert
corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Tue Apr 10 10:47:35 PDT 2007
Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2007 Apr 10 (Tue) at 18:03:49 +0200 (+0200), Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
:cvsync does cvs-only (so,
:like rsync), but it has a bug which breaks the RCS files in some cases.
:The author didn't want to fix it though :/
Can you describe the bug? I've been using cvsync for local copies of
the openbsd source tree and haven't seen any RCS corruption.
It missorders revisions on branches. CVS then fails to perform a annotate on those revisions (try something like 1.X.Y.2 or so).
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low â¬â¬â¬ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: "Description: OpenPGP digital signature"
More information about the Users