Current stable tag slip status
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Fri Mar 25 12:08:50 PST 2005
:Or you could follow Gentoo's lead (some other Linux distros have also
:gone that way I think) and go with 2005.1, 2005.2 etc and then go to
:2006.1 etc (or even 2005.4 since it's released in April?)? Version
:numbers are pretty arbitrary anyway, so why not use something that makes
:sense to humans?Anyway, you can't get much worse than Sun's Java
:numbering scheme *G*
Not a bad idea though that will create a problem if/when we branch
and start maintaining two releases at once.
At the moment I am loosely basing the release number half on the year
and half on how far I think we've progressed through our goals set.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More information about the Users
mailing list