upgrade from FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE
Jake Maciejewski
maciejej at msoe.edu
Thu Feb 24 02:36:24 PST 2005
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:27 +0800, Bill Hacker wrote:
> Janet Sullivan wrote:
>
> > Are there any known issues upgrading from FreeBSD 4.11 to Dragonfly, or
> > should the instructions at
> > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/upgrade-freebsd.cgi still work just fine?
>
> 4.10 and later have a progressively increasing number of 5.X'ish
> backports included. (I run 4.9 thru 4.11-STABLE).
>
When I upgraded from 4.10, the only thing I noticed was that some of the
changes in UPDATING had already been made.
> I do not know if those steps will still work without further ado, but I
> can say that if you can do so, a 'clean' DragonFlyBSD install from ISO,
> newfs and all, is *very much* faster - and very trouble-free.
I agree that binary is cleaner and faster, but if you don't want the
downtime or want a custom kernel or optomizations, you'd have to build
from source eventually anyway.
>
> I can have DragonFlyBSD up from ISO, then thru binary (pkgsrc)
> installation put on my httpd, Squid, Zope/Plone, PostgreSQL, MTA,
> IMAP/POP, and (when wanted), even X with GNOME and/or Xfce-4, in less
> time than the 'make' cycle can do the kernel and world alone.
>
> So far, SpamAssassin and the latest Exim are all that I have had to
> build from ports. pkg_add -rv {whatever} did the rest painlessly.
>
> Installation of the dports, followed by a cvsup to latest FreeBSD ports
> tree, adding portupgrade, and using it on the few that portaudit
> complains about then gets you about as current as can be (some pkgsrc
> are not the latest).
>
> YMMV,
>
> Bill Hacker
--
Jake Maciejewski <maciejej at xxxxxxxx>
More information about the Users
mailing list