xl device doesn't work with ACPI enabled under -current and -stable
Joerg Sonnenberger
joerg at britannica.bec.de
Thu Feb 3 13:32:30 PST 2005
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:06:59PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> But then when CBB0 comes along, the irq is not routed, so
> pci_alloc_resource() calls PCIB_ROUTE_INTERRUPT(). PCIB_ROUTE_INTERRUPT()
> has *NO* clue that it *MUST* use irq 11 (because xl0 and cbb0 share the
> same int pin), so it goes and allocates irq 3.
PCIB_ROUTE_INTERRUPT calls the way up to pci_cfgintr.
pci_cfgintr first checks via pci_cfgintr_valid if a valid interrupt
already exists, which doesn't happen here.
It checks pci_cfgintr_linked next, which whould find the mapping for xl0
and stop using that link. This doesn't somehow happen.
The strange part and the reason why I suspect the ACPI tables [which
I still haven't looked into] is the different configuration of the
secondary PCI bus at the time of cbb probe. Another strange part is
the different subordinatebus / secondarybus field. I have to start
reading the PCI specs now.
Joerg
More information about the Users
mailing list