Compatability with FreeBSD Ports

Hiten Pandya hmp at
Mon Aug 15 17:09:25 PDT 2005>
In-Reply-To: <20050815231944.GA1595 at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
X-Trace: 1124150978 742
Xref: dragonfly.users:3825

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> is NOT about package management. It is about building
> packages. Don't forget this difference, it is important. Building is
> exactly nothing but scripting a bunch of commands.
> If I can once more stress the comparision with Debian, it's the
> difference between dpkg-buildpackage and dpkg/apt-get. There are a lot
> of things to solve on the *package* management level, porting apt-get
> would be a start. But don't mix or confuse them with with *build* level
> problems. To look over to Linux, that's why Gentoo is so fragile,
> because it also doesn't have a clear separation and binary package
> support in Gentoo sucks even compared to the BSDs.

So are you saying that we will be using pkgsrc as a framework for building 
the binary packages, but the actual management of the build packages will 
be done using a different, maybe mutated set of applications?

If I am understanding correctly, you are trying to separate the domain of 
package building (which is where we use the pkgsrc framework) from package 
management, right?

			Hiten Pandya
			hmp at xxxxxxxxxxxxx

More information about the Users mailing list