Compatability with FreeBSD Ports [debian package tools]
talon at lpthe.jussieu.fr
Wed Aug 17 09:47:29 PDT 2005
> <4303571D.9050306 at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <4303571D.9050306 at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Message-ID: <43036a16$0$739$415eb37d at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Trace: 1124297239 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 739 126.96.36.199
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:3851
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> In my opinion, the option to build packages is only useful to people who
> want extreme modifications to their applications. I am sure most
> people, including me would not really care about source packages; I for
> one would not bother building OpenOffice or KDE locally, total waste of
I totally agree with you.
> Extremely important to get binary package management right, including
> dependency handling, (automatic) updating.
Yes. But how do you manage those softs, unfortunately extremely
important, which cannot be delivered in binary form, like Java,
and their dependencies?
If it was not for these softs, and some other softs like Gnome, which
are constantly broken for any reason, i have the impression (illusion?)
that portupgrade -PP would do the job perfectly.
> Hiten Pandya
> hmp at xxxxxxxxxxxxx
More information about the Users