Multi-core processors

Danial Thom danial_thom at
Fri Apr 15 12:24:35 PDT 2005

--- Erik Wikström <erik-wikstrom at xxxxxxxxx>
> Danial Thom wrote:
> > I find it rather interesting that all of the
> > intel-bashing "testers" are now reporting
> that
> > there is "no performance gain" from dual-core
> > processors which has always pretty much been
> the
> > case with DP systems. It seems that its going
> to
> > take quad-core processors to see real gains
> over
> > "designed for UP" operating systems, how long
> do
> > you think its going to be before such animals
> are
> > available?
> The gains of dual-code is very dependent on the
> type
> of applications being run and how many of
> those. But
> generally speaking most applications today are
> single-
> threaded and thus does not gain anything from
> dual-core
> However if you run two or more applications at
> the same
> time they can both execute at the same time
> which gives
> a performance gain. However it will not be as
> big as
> when using two processors if they are
> memory-intensive
> since both cores share the same bus.
> The difference can easily be noticed if you are
> heavily
> multitasking, the GUIs of applications will
> become more
> responsive and the computer will feel snappier
> over all.
> You might want to take a look at AnandTech for
> a
> comparison of single- and dual-core:
the problem with technical analysis is that a
case can be made for or against any product
depending on what tests you do, and most sites,
like most techies, are anti-intel-biased. The
comment at the end of the article is a perfect
example: they blantently ignore the possibility
that you might, just might, be doing 2 or more
things at once on your desktop. With multi-core,
the benchmarks have to be multi-tasked not just
multi-threaded. I don't only want to know how
fast application A is on single and dual core,
but also how fast it is when application B is
also hammering away. 

There is a cost of threading an application, and
my point was that with "only" 2 processors you
barely if at all make up what's lost. Linux with
2 processors is still a bit slower than FreeBSD
4.x with one for most networking tasks.

Intel is putting tremendous resources into
multi-core, well beyond 2, in fact they are
talking about "dozens" of cores. Dual-core is
just marketing. Just a breadcrumb so that people
can start to do just what you guys are doing.


Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 

More information about the Users mailing list