[DragonFlyBSD - Submit #3085] [PATCH] pf(4): Bring some IPv6-related fixes from OpenBSD

bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org
Sat Oct 21 19:32:54 PDT 2017


Issue #3085 has been updated by sepherosa.


Committed!  Thank you!

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:06 PM,
<bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
> Issue #3085 has been updated by sepherosa.
>
>
> I will take care of this patch.
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:38 PM,
> <bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
>> Issue #3085 has been reported by liweitianux.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Submit #3085: [PATCH] pf(4): Bring some IPv6-related fixes from OpenBSD
>> http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3085
>>
>> * Author: liweitianux
>> * Status: New
>> * Priority: Normal
>> * Assignee:
>> * Category: PF
>> * Target version:
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Hello,
>>
>> The attached patch contains the following 3 commits that I brought from OpenBSD:
>>
>> 1. pf: use IN6_IS_SCOPE_EMBED to check kernel-internal form addresses
>> 2. pf: Always skip "urpf-failed" test for IPv6 link local addresses
>> 3. pf: Make pf_print_host() print IPv6 addresses correctly
>>
>> The second commit fixes the "uprf-failed" issue on IPv6 that I shared on the mailing list some time ago [1].  With this fix, the "urpf-failed" rule can just be enabled on both IPv4 and IPv6.
>>
>> Credit to Marcin Wisnicki, who pointed out the problem and gave fixes to it [2].
>>
>> [1] http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-August/313577.html
>> [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2010-July/005724.html
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aly
>>
>> ---Files--------------------------------
>> pf-inet6.patch (3.73 KB)
>>
>>
>> --
>> You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
>> To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
>
>
>
> --
> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Submit #3085: [PATCH] pf(4): Bring some IPv6-related fixes from OpenBSD
> http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3085#change-13276
>
> * Author: liweitianux
> * Status: New
> * Priority: Normal
> * Assignee:
> * Category: PF
> * Target version:
> ----------------------------------------
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch contains the following 3 commits that I brought from OpenBSD:
>
> 1. pf: use IN6_IS_SCOPE_EMBED to check kernel-internal form addresses
> 2. pf: Always skip "urpf-failed" test for IPv6 link local addresses
> 3. pf: Make pf_print_host() print IPv6 addresses correctly
>
> The second commit fixes the "uprf-failed" issue on IPv6 that I shared on the mailing list some time ago [1].  With this fix, the "urpf-failed" rule can just be enabled on both IPv4 and IPv6.
>
> Credit to Marcin Wisnicki, who pointed out the problem and gave fixes to it [2].
>
> [1] http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-August/313577.html
> [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2010-July/005724.html
>
>
> Cheers,
> Aly
>
> ---Files--------------------------------
> pf-inet6.patch (3.73 KB)
>
>
> --
> You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
> To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account



-- 
Tomorrow Will Never Die

----------------------------------------
Submit #3085: [PATCH] pf(4): Bring some IPv6-related fixes from OpenBSD
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3085#change-13282

* Author: liweitianux
* Status: New
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: PF
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
Hello,

The attached patch contains the following 3 commits that I brought from OpenBSD:

1. pf: use IN6_IS_SCOPE_EMBED to check kernel-internal form addresses
2. pf: Always skip "urpf-failed" test for IPv6 link local addresses
3. pf: Make pf_print_host() print IPv6 addresses correctly

The second commit fixes the "uprf-failed" issue on IPv6 that I shared on the mailing list some time ago [1].  With this fix, the "urpf-failed" rule can just be enabled on both IPv4 and IPv6.

Credit to Marcin Wisnicki, who pointed out the problem and gave fixes to it [2].

[1] http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-August/313577.html
[2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2010-July/005724.html


Cheers,
Aly

---Files--------------------------------
pf-inet6.patch (3.73 KB)


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account



More information about the Submit mailing list