[issue1615] Clean up bind commit to master, revert to vendor

[Simon 'corecode' Schubert]

Jan.Lentfer at web.de wrote:
Zitat von "Simon 'corecode' Schubert (via DragonFly issue tracker)" 
<submit at crater.dragonflybsd.org>:

Yes, we should decide.  But both should be on the same branch, for
coherency.
Reasons for master:
- those files don't belong to the tar ball
Reasons for vendor branch:
- the READMEs describe the files (and what was removed) of the tar ball
I don't mind either, just coherency.  I propose to decide on what goes
where first, and after that do the import.  Or at least pack both files
into the same branch.
According to development(7) both should go on master:
"Now you are free to change the sources in contrib/foo, since you are back
on the master branch.  The first thing to do is to add README.DRAGONFLY
and README.DELETED."
Well, that's what I wrote.  However if people think that it is better to 
put it on the vendor branch (and I can see reasons for that), then we 
should change it.

cheers
  simon