replace true(1) and false(1) with simple shell scripts
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Mon Mar 20 09:07:11 PST 2006
We are going to stick with the C version. There is no reason to nerf
the performance of the programs even if one assumes that they will
hardly ever be used in a time-critical situation. It certainly isn't
worth the byte-savings for the files since they are already only
3280 bytes each.
Neither do we need to adopt _exit() vs exit(), or link statically, or
play any other tricks which have no clear benefit. The performance is
just fine as it.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More information about the Submit
mailing list