tcpdrop(8) for DragonFly
andre at digirati.com.br
Sun Nov 14 11:54:16 PST 2004
Matthew Dillon said:
> It sounds like the sysctl should have two options, but at least for
> any initial implementation it should use shutdown rather then drop.
> There are plenty of ways to deal with TIME_WAIT that would not impose
> much additional overhead verses a drop.
Would you prefer this option to be set by the caller of the sysctl, or
should a new sysctl be added (something like "net.inet.tcp.drop_action"),
which would cause soshutdown() or soabort() depending on it's value?
More information about the Submit