ISC DHCP 3 vulnerabilities

Wed Jun 23 07:56:46 PDT 2004

On 23.06.2004, at 14:40, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:

Anyone got time to update?

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA04-174A.html
This just applies to dhcpd, if I read the alerts correctly. And it 
seems that we don't have dhcpd in base. Speaking of which: do we want 
to have dhcpd in base?

cheers
  simon
--
/"\
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00002.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/submit/attachments/20040623/7afc51a4/attachment-0019.obj>