cleaned up x11/nvidia-driver override port
coolvibe at hackerheaven.org
Wed Feb 11 16:32:31 PST 2004
Op Thursday 12 February 2004 01:10, schreef Matthew Dillon:
> Emiel, after unpacking your new patch the only difference relative to
> your initial submission that David committed on 1/14 is that you've
> added a new file, "files/patch-dfly".
> Is this correct?
I changed the patch name, it's more obvious that it's a dragonfly-specific
patch that way. The ports system picks up the patch anyway. Maybe I'll split
up the patches into which files they change some day if that's wanted :)
Also in the patch itself I added a new header file nv-dragonfly.h (which is
just DragonFly specific), and split up dragonfly and freebsd cdevsw
structures more, so it's easier to change if anything in dragonfly changes,
instead of hopping around the #ifdef's all the time.
> p.s. please don't use shar! tar is fine, and for patch sets like these
> it's even better to use a 'diff -r -u -N oldir newdir' or 'cvs diff' if
> you aren't adding any new files, or 'cvs diff -N' if the changes do include
> new files and you've cvs add'd the files to your local repository.
> Finally, do not include the 'CVS' directories when posting a submission.
Will remember that next time. I thought shar was the preferred formats for
ports? Oh well, I can just as easily make a tarball.
I can easily resubmit if there are any further objections.
The faster we go, the rounder we get.
-- The Grateful Dead
More information about the Submit