C++ include path
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Mon Apr 5 13:58:32 PDT 2004
:Attached patch adds /usr/include/c++ as include directory for both compiler
:versions. It should be used for all in-tree C++ headers which are itself
:version independent [currently only lex].
The patch looks good.
We definitely want to do the double-pathing (BLAH and BLAH/compilerrev).
Do you think we are going to hit any major problems by making BLAH
/usr/include/c++ instead of the FreeBSD /usr/include/g++ ?
I'm a bit undecided... I don't mind us using /usr/include/g++ and
/usr/include/g++/<compiler_rev> instead of c++ and c++/<compiler_rev>,
but the name 'c++' seems to be more compiler agnostic then g++, especially
since we are breaking the compiler-specific files into their own
<compiler_rev> sub directory. I've been holding off cleaning up the
old /usr/include/g++ in upgrade_etc until we come to a decision on how
we actually want it to look.
What do you think?
More information about the Submit